Fourth Amendment Claims

False Arrest & Unlawful Detention Claims

The Fourth Amendment protects you from arrest without probable cause. When officers violate this right, you can sue for the wrongful deprivation of your liberty.

Key Takeaways

Probable Cause Required: Officers need specific facts—not hunches or vague suspicion—to justify an arrest.
Outcome Doesn't Matter: Whether charges were filed, dropped, or you were convicted is less important than whether probable cause existed at the moment of arrest.
Qualified Immunity Applies: Officers may claim immunity if they reasonably believed probable cause existed—even if wrong.
Significant Damages: Compensation includes lost wages, emotional distress, humiliation, and punitive damages.

Fourth Amendment Protections

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures—including arrest without probable cause.

Seizure

An arrest is a seizure of your person. Even brief detentions trigger Fourth Amendment protection.

Probable Cause Required

Officers must have facts sufficient to warrant a reasonable person to believe a crime was committed.

Reasonable Officer Standard

Courts ask whether a reasonable officer would believe probable cause existed—not whether THIS officer believed it.

Objective Facts Only

The officer's after-the-fact justifications don't count. Only facts known at the time of arrest matter.

The Probable Cause Standard

Probable cause exists when facts and circumstances known to the officer would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime was committed. It's more than a hunch but less than proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Probable Cause Likely Exists

• Eyewitness identifies you specifically
• Found with identifiable stolen property
• Matching detailed suspect description
• Reliable informant with track record

Probable Cause Likely Lacking

• Vague "Black male, gray hoodie" description
• Anonymous tip without corroboration
• Present in "high crime area" alone
• Officer's hunch or gut feeling

Key Distinction

Courts evaluate probable cause based on what the officer knew at the moment of arrest—not what was discovered later. Evidence found after arrest can't retroactively justify an arrest that lacked initial probable cause.

Common False Arrest Scenarios

Scenario	Description	Claim Strength
Mistaken Identity	Arrested because you matched a vague description or shared a name with someone else	Strong if description was generic
Fabricated Evidence	Officer lied about what they observed or manufactured evidence to justify arrest	Very strong
Wrong Address Warrant	Executed warrant at wrong location, arresting innocent residents	Strong
Retaliatory Arrest	Arrested for exercising First Amendment rights (filming police, protests)	Strong with evidence of motive
Pretext Arrests	Minor violation used as excuse to arrest someone the officer targeted	Moderate—requires proving lack of cause
Failure to Investigate	Officer ignored obvious exculpatory information before arresting	Strong if ignored info was significant

Officer Defenses & How We Counter

Qualified Immunity

Counter: Find prior cases with similar facts establishing the right to be free from this exact type of arrest

Probable Cause Existed

Counter: Attack each fact the officer relies on—were they reliable? Fabricated? Exaggerated?

Good Faith Reliance on Warrant

Counter: Challenge whether the warrant application contained false statements or material omissions

Collective Knowledge

Counter: Demand who told them what, when—break the chain if information was unreliable

Arguable Probable Cause

Counter: Even if insufficient, officers may be immune if 'reasonable minds could differ'

Recoverable Damages

Category	Examples
Compensatory Damages	Lost wages, attorney's fees for criminal defense, medical expenses from jail conditions
Emotional Distress	Humiliation, anxiety, depression, PTSD, damage to mental health
Reputational Harm	Loss of employment, damage to relationships, community standing
Physical Harm	Injuries during arrest, inadequate medical care while detained
Punitive Damages	When officer's conduct was intentional, reckless, or showed conscious disregard for rights

Time in Custody Matters

Hours Detained

Any detention matters, but longer custody increases damages significantly

Conditions of Confinement

Jail conditions, cell assignments, treatment by staff all affect damages

Public Exposure

Whether the arrest was witnessed, publicized, or affected employment

Criminal Process Duration

Time spent fighting charges before dismissal compounds harm

Frequently Asked Questions

A false arrest claim under §1983 requires proving that you were arrested without probable cause—meaning no reasonable officer would have believed you committed a crime based on the facts known at the time. If the officer lacked probable cause or fabricated evidence to justify the arrest, you have a viable claim.

Yes, potentially. Charges being dropped doesn't automatically mean the arrest was unlawful (officers only need probable cause at the time of arrest), but it can be strong evidence. If charges were dropped because the evidence was fabricated or the officer lied, your case is stronger.

An arrest without subsequent charges can support a false arrest claim, especially if it suggests the DA found no probable cause. However, officers don't need enough evidence for conviction—only enough for probable cause at the moment of arrest.

Damages include compensation for time spent in custody, emotional distress, humiliation, damage to reputation, lost wages, attorney's fees to defend against charges, and punitive damages if the officer's conduct was particularly egregious. The length of detention significantly affects damages.

Innocence helps emotionally but isn't legally required. What matters is whether the officer had probable cause at the time of arrest. An innocent person arrested with probable cause based on reliable (but ultimately wrong) information may not have a claim. A guilty person arrested without probable cause does have a claim.

Arrested Without Probable Cause?

A wrongful arrest violates your constitutional rights. We fight to hold officers and departments accountable for unlawful seizures.

Free Consultation